Monday 8 April 2013

A Biblical Theology of the Ocean





I have noticed that the concept of the sea is used a number of times in both the old and new testaments. Is this incidental or significant? I would like to trace the motif throughout the bible and, in doing so, to highlight the concepts importance for our biblical theology.

Context
First, some cultural bridging is needed. For the modern Western mind, the idea of the sea might conjure images of tranquillity, peace or adventure. But what does it bring to the mind of an Israelite? What if lifeboats and wet suits and cruise ships didn't exist? What if all we had to navigate it was a small, rugged sail boat? What if the only way you could get by in life was if the sea produced enough fish for you each day? And what if you knew that, if one day the sea decided, you would most certainly either run out of food or drown?

I think we can imagine a few associations it might have for a biblical author. I suggest that among other things, it would convey these ideas:
·         Confusion, uncertainty
·         Chaos, futility
·         Loneliness, frailty
·         Being out of control
·         Unrelenting, unceasing force
·         Vast, engulfing force
·         Unfriendly, destructive force

In the beginning

Now let’s look to the beginning. Gen 1:2: “The earth was without form, and void; and darkness was on the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters.” The Hebrew word for “the deep” (tehom) could also be translated the “great abyss”. It is formless, unsupportive of life and created by God. Next He divides the waters with the “Heaven” (Gen 1:6-8), and again dividing the lower waters with “firmament” amongst it (Gen 1:9-10) “and God saw that it was good”. Next He calls the firmament to bring forth plants that will yield fruit. So He creates a lifeless void and then parts it. He could have just created firmament to bring forth fruit, but He starts with the void and pierces it with fruit. I'm not going to slather this with theology just yet but I want you to keep it in mind. I also would like to point out that once the creatures had been created it was Adam’s job to have “dominion over the fish of the sea”. This is an important theme for understanding the effects of the fall.

Noah

A few chapters on, man’s wickedness is punished and, out of the many options, God uses a very particular means to do so. So, when God destroyed every living creature with a global flood but ‘remembered’ Noah and made a way for His family to be saved, both the wrath and the deliverance are imbued with significance.
Firstly, like how God created the deep, not simply divided it, the flood must be recognised as God’s own judgement (Gen. 6:5-7) not a natural occurrence that God set about trying to repair. “Your judgements are like the great deep, oh LORD” -Psalm 36:6.
Secondly, let us look the nature of this judgement. Why is it appropriate? I have noticed that the ideas I suggested the sea was intended to convey (confusion, futility etc.) are a lucid reflection of the nature of evil itself. Which means this judgement is a horrible but natural end to the trajectory of the wicked person’s life. The confusion the flood brought them was a result of the confusion and foolishness of their godless lives. The chaos and futility of the flood only followed from the chaos and vanity of their lives. The loneliness and frailty they experienced in the flood mirrored that of their decision to be distant from the good and sovereign God. And the loss of their control was the final demonstration of God’s ultimate providence over their licentiousness.
With this significance in mind, God rescuing Noah from His own wrath of the waters is also layered with meaning. God is not just piercing the deep, but bringing forth the firmament that produces life and fruit. The firmament is godliness: rescue from His wrath. He provided assurance in the midst of uncertainty (Gen. 8:21b, 9:11b), He blessed and mandated life and multiplicity in the midst of chaos and futility (Gen. 9:1), He established a covenant relationship with Himself as Lord, in the wake of a world who embraced loneliness and frailty by distancing itself from God (Gen. 9:9, Psalm. 19:7), and He gave control and dominion (restoring Gen 1:28) where, for the rest of the world, the appearance of control God had ripped away (Gen. 9:2). In summary, God saves Noah from the thrashing and heaving of evil and its judgement, bringing him into blessed covenant with Himself.

Moses

So when we come to Exodus, should we think of it as coincidence that God’s people encounter both evil and the ocean again? Notice that it was God Himself in the pillar of cloud and fire who led them there. And let us also consider again the correlation between the objects of wrath and the means by which that wrath was executed. That is: the suffering they were subjected to reflected the suffering they caused. Their confusion, futility, loneliness and destruction of the ocean consummated that of their godless lives.
Finally, let us see that God does not let the water cover everyone. He divides it with firmament, and there, between the many waters, He puts His special people and promises abundant life for them (Ex. 3:17.)

Jonah

Let us also heed the book of Jonah. ”the word of the Lord came to Jonah” (Jonah 1:1) giving him the commission to prophecy against Nineveh. But instead of obeying, Jonah flees from the “presence of the Lord” and into a boat going to Joppa. “The Lord hurled a great wind on the sea and there was a great storm on the sea so that the ship was about to break up.” Consequently, the men cast lots, telling them that God brought the storm on them because Jonah was “fleeing from the presence of the Lord.” “So they said to him, “What should we do to you that the sea may become calm for us?”—for the sea was becoming increasingly stormy. He said to them, “Pick me up and throw me into the sea. Then the sea will become calm for you, for I know that on account of me this great storm has come upon you.” And they did, and it did.
At this point let’s recognise two points of the emerging pattern: 1. God Himself caused the threat of the sea, and 2. It was rebellion from God that provoked it.
But another important concept is suggested: Jonah urges them to throw him into the ocean in order to calm the storm. Why? It tells us that sin is not easily acquitted, that God’s wrath is not easily placated, that it is just and fitting for a man who fled the surety of God’s presence to die in the tumult of the sea, but most importantly, maybe it is even suggesting that many can be saved from the storm of God’s wrath when a man of God gives up his life as the punishment of sin.

Once this had happened, “the Lord appointed a great fish to swallow Jonah” where he prayed a thoroughly Psalm-like prayer (Jonah 2), borrowing much from passages like Psalm 18. Again God divides the waters and plants life: He appoints a fish and Jonah repents. Jonah is rescued from the chaos of the sea so he can be rescued from the chaos of godlessness. He is delivered so that he might return to the word of God and obey it. This is important for our understanding of what it means to be rescued from the ocean.

[1]As we read through redemptive history the sea takes on massive significance for our biblical theology. Its confusion and futility is a picture of both human depravity and God’s destructive wrath, it demands to have those who resist the precepts of God, and deliverance from it can come only to God’s chosen people: those who love Him and obey Him.
In light of these things, let us approach their fulfilment.

Jesus

The account of Jesus calming the storm is found in each of the synoptic gospels (Mt 8:23-27, Mk 4:35-41, Lk 8:22-25). I will suggest a summative outline but don’t take my word for it without looking for yourself.

Setting the scene
·         the raging storm
·         Jesus sleeping
Main body
·         the disciples bemoan their danger
·         Jesus asserts their lack of faith
·         Jesus calms the sea
·         the disciples profess Jesus’ authority

The first relevant thing to notice is why each account records that Jesus was asleep. The most obvious reason is it clearly echoes Jonah who was also sleeping in the inner part of the ship. It indicates that Jesus is a continuation and fulfilment of what was taught in the book of Jonah. Possibly what shouts the loudest about this passage is what is left unspoken. Jesus does echo Jonah sleeping and calming the storm but does not echo Jonah being thrown into the ocean, nor being swallowed by a great fish, nor on third day being spat out.  The picture is not complete. He has not entered the raging sea, but he will. This must be borne in mind.
Secondly, it highlights a powerful contrast. Isaiah 57:20-21 says “the wicked are like the tossing sea, which cannot rest...  “There is no peace,” says my God, “for the wicked.””  The disciples had no peace: they were distressed. Jesus, on the other hand, was utterly peaceful, he slept through the storm. The restlessness, confusion and futility of the sea did not reach him.

The second question that strikes me is why is it a lack of faith to be afraid of a storm? Were the disciples not just being realistic?
I have asked that question more than once but I only felt like I reached a satisfying answer when I happened to be reading 2 Corinthians recently. “To the one we are the fragrance of death unto death; and to the other the fragrance of life unto life.” (2 Cor 2:16). We are the fragrance of death to those who are the dying and of life to those who are living. What is the fragrance? The fragrance is of Christ and the gospel that we bear. Why does the message of the gospel smell like death to some? Because the concept of salvation by faith alone is not good news for those who do not have faith: if they had faith they would have known they were protected. In fact, God’s justice reeks of judgement and destruction to them. They fear wrath because they know they are not protected from it.
So, if our work in the Old Testament tells us that the ocean is a picture of God’s wrath,  and 2 Corinthians tells us that those who have no faith will fear wrath (understandably), then the disciples fearing the ocean, however understandable, would demonstrate a lack of faith. This is why the master biblical asks "Why are you afraid? Do you still have no faith?"

My next question is, why exactly does Jesus calming the sea provoke their faith? Faith in Jesus as what? Neptune? A really good weather man? What did the act of calming the sea claim about his identity? We saw that in each OT passage, it was Yahweh himself who brought about a means of escape from the ocean. This is because, ultimately, only the covenant-maker can stipulate how the covenant-breakers are dealt with. Only the sinned against can pardon sins. Only God can calm the sea. If that’s the case, “Who is this? Even the wind and the waves obey him!” He can only be the covenant-maker, and the sinned against. By saying he is the one ho calms the ocean, he is saying he is Yahweh. This is why it provoked faith in the disciples. This is why they recognised it as a claim to divine authority. This is the explication and the climax of all that it has previously meant to be God’s special people whom are saved from the sea. Those who live in the chaos of godlessness will enter the chaos of the ocean, but those who live in the wisdom of recognising Christ’s supremacy will be saved from the ocean. Knowing Christ is the life and fruit that is planted in the firmament that divides the waters.

To summarise, we can reaffirm that God both ordains the sea and ordains deliverance from it. Furthermore, recognition of all that Christ is, including his death, is the pinnacle of what it means to be saved from the ocean, because faith in Christ casts out fear of the ocean.
                                                                                        

Paul

With this in mind, let’s turn to Paul’s epistle to the Ephesians. It will enrich our understanding of what it is to be taken by the ocean and what it is to be saved from it.
And he gave the apostles, the prophets, the evangelists, the shepherds and teachers, to equip the saints for the work of ministry, for building up the body of Christ, until we all attain to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to mature manhood, to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ, so that we may no longer be children, tossed to and fro by the waves and carried about by every wind of doctrine, by human cunning, by craftiness in deceitful schemes. Rather, speaking the truth in love, we are to grow up in every way into him who is the head, into Christ” (Eph 4:11-14).
I see two main semantic fields:
1.       That of the ‘body’:  where the work of our lives and sanctification is headed
2.       That of the sea: where our former lives were headed
They are described as parallel opposites. The first centres on the idea of ‘oikodomōn’ which means to build, equip or edify. Each particular part of the body is to work as it should, in love, so as to ‘build up’ the whole. Each is to strive to attain to full maturity in the work of the ministry, and the wholes unified understanding and faith in Christ. The picture is of a loving, wise, powerful, focused, effective, God-centred, organically identical, interdependent, self-sacrificial, Spirit filled, grace driven body (see also Eph. 1:15-23, 2:10 and 3:14-19).
The second semantic field is a supporting concept, flowing from the first. The second is employed to describe, negatively, an aspect of the first.  Christ’s body is not carried by the waves. His mature body is not tossed to and fro by the waves of every deceitful teaching. The members are not broken or divided in terms of doctrine. Why? Because, by speaking the truth in love, each body part utilises its gifts so that the whole sees the truth of Christ, and the whole trusts the truth of Christ, and the life of the whole converges with the truth of Christ. Herein the body grows into perfect consolidation with Christ Himself: the head and the solid ground. The confusion, futility, loneliness and relentless destruction of the sea is the home of those who are willing to comply with any philosophical trend and, and its effect is dissention and division. It is home to the whole world in Genesis 6, and to the Egyptians in Exodus 3 and to thousands of millions of other people. But it is not the home of the body of Christ. The home of the body is a unified recognition of Christ as Yahweh through the truth being spoken.

In the end

Finally, these ideas culminate in the apocalyptic prophecy of Revelation. This passage needs little exposition when it emerges from its precursory passages. Let us submit to its full force.

Rev. 20:13-15: “The sea gave up the dead that were in it, and death and Hades gave up the dead that were in them... Then death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire. The lake of fire is the second death. Anyone whose name was not found written in the book of life was thrown into the lake of fire. Then I saw a new heaven and a new earth, for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away, and the sea was no more.

The sea will be no more. No more uncertainty, no more fruitlessness, no more oppression, or loneliness or frailty. No more tears.

When the ocean is engulfing you, know that God has parted the waters and planted life at the cost of the cross. He has put to death the vast power of godlessness. You are not helpless. Trust in Jesus who is Yahweh. Use your individual gifts to edify the whole body, recognise and speak the truth of Christ, and know that in the new earth, there will be no more ocean.




[1] There are many other pertinent passages that we don’t have time to look at here but I hope when you read them now, their meaning for you will be enriched as a result of the this

No comments:

Post a Comment